top of page

About...

Aliteracy

Reading for enjoyment is a rapidly declining pastime. As a consequence we live in a world that is, sadly, becoming more and more aliterate by the day.  Aliteracy, a term first used by Daniel Boorstin, the US Librarian of Congress in 1984, is defined as the state in which the skill to read has been acquired, but not the will. He referred to illiteracy and aliteracy as the ‘twin menaces’ for society as a whole (Weeks, 2001).

​

Teachers know the implicit relationship between reading enjoyment and increased educational outcomes. This trend has also been well documented in studies both within Australia and internationally. Startlingly, “reading enjoyment has been reported as more important for children’s educational success than their family’s socio-economic status” (Department for Education, 2012). Many studies show that a person who reads recreationally is more likely to have a higher level of literacy, for example, in a reading for enjoyment program for low-literacy adult readers, Rodrigo et al. (2014) found that literacy levels increased and remained stable for six-months after intervention.

Daniel_Boorstin.jpg

US Librarian of Congress and coiner of the term 'Aliteracy', Daniel Boorstin

In another study, Sammons et al. (2018) found that students who read for enjoyment more at home were more likely to achieve their A-Levels. OECD data also shows that “students who read daily for enjoyment score the equivalent of one-and-a-half years of schooling better than those who do not” (OECD, 2011, p. 2). Tellingly, Manuel & Carter (2015) noted a “direct and strong correlation between teenagers’ motivation to read, the amount of time spent reading – both for leisure and because they are required to by a teacher – and students’ reading achievement” (p. 126). That is to say, if students read, even if they are obligated to, they are more likely to achieve.  

​

Teachers also observe that the reading efficacy of their students has declined over time. Again, these trends are represented in the data where the 2019 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) indicates that reading performance in Australia has been steadily declining since 2000 - a trend also observed worldwide (OECD., 2019). Merga (2014) also found that infrequent engagement with reading was related to deficiencies in holding attention for a sustained period. 


The decline in reading efficacy is no doubt linked to declining reading for enjoyment. Jackie Manuel & Don Carter (2015) found in their research that only 19.5% of surveyed students identified reading as their most preferred leisure activity, while 30% indicated that it was their least favourite leisure activity. It is increasingly evident that the attention of young people is captured elsewhere. By comparison, 61% of the young people in Manuel and Carter’s (2015) study indicated that using digital devices was the preferred leisure activity. 


The Australian Bureau of Statistics also corroborates that reading for pleasure diminishes as children age, finding that children between the ages of 5 and 8 more frequently read for enjoyment than their 12 to 14 year old counterparts. Furthermore, their data shows that overall, regardless of age, the act of reading for pleasure is not as popular as it used to be, significantly decreasing between 2003 and 2012 (ABS, 2012). The Scholastic Kids and Family Reading Report (7th Edition) also shows similar findings with dramatic decreases in reading for pleasure as students age (Scholastic, 2019).

Digital reading does not result in the benefits that "sustained, long-form reading" does

There is no single reason why reading for enjoyment has declined so much, however there are likely to be several explanations. Firstly, the rapid rise in digital technology and social media usage certainly affects the amount of reading that all people do - even adults. Rutherford, Merga and Singleton (2018) reference the common argument that digitisation has required young people engage in more incidental reading than ever before, however they are right to point out that this reading is not the “sustained, long-form reading” (p.45) that has been shown to have the noted positive effects. Green (2022) laments the habit of bite-size reading, where “viewers very speedily bounce, flick, and skitter across the surface of web pages, looking rather than finding and snatching only snippets of information” (p.70), warning that a movement away from longer, involved, deep reading prevents young people from envisioning worlds and plots through the reading of larger texts. In a similar vein, Merga (2019) points out that reading does not provide the immediate dopamine hit that young people gain from the ever more popular pastime of gaming. 

The old adage ‘practice makes perfect’ is also true when it comes to reading for enjoyment, where the decline in the amount of reading that young people do makes it more difficult for them to engage in reading in a sustained manner. Kucirkova and Cremin (2020) make the useful comparison to sport:

​

 

​

​


So there exists a vicious cycle where those who do not read for pleasure actually need to spend more time reading in order to gain the intrinsic motivation to read more and gain pleasure from it. This reading “will” is often lacking, and as Merga (2019) points out, “young people must have the skill and the will to read” (p. 2).


Merga (2019) suggests other factors which influence a decline in reading for enjoyment, including the increasing demands of schooling and extracurricular activities on children’s time. She also asserts that generally, reading is not promoted as a valuable pastime in schools and that the focus on reading attainment always overshadows reading for enjoyment. Ultimately, the reading habits of young people can only increase if the activity is valued at both at home and at school.

No young footballer will improve their skills without practice, without taking the space and time to kick a ball around with friends. Many will spend hours informally practising on the playground, after school and in the community… Reading for Pleasure has some similarities: intrinsically motivated young readers make the space and time to read alone and with others.  (p.73)

References

​

Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS]. (2012). Children's Participation in Cultural and Leisure Activities, Australia. Retrieved from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/ people-and-communities/childrens-participation-cultural-and-leisure-activities-australia/latest-release 

 

Department for Education (2012). Research evidence on reading for pleasure: Education standards research team. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/284286/reading_for_pleasure.pdf 

​

Green, M. (2022).  For the love of good stories: a narrative inquiry into a reading for enjoyment pedagogy. [Doctoral dissertation, Australian Catholic University].  ORCID. https://doi.org/10.14264/63b190c 

​

Kucirkova, N. & Cremin, T. (2020). Children Reading for Pleasure in the Digital Age. SAGE Publications Ltd.

​

Rutherford, L., Merga, M. K., & Singleton, A. (2018).  Influences on Australian adolescents’ recreational reading. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 41(1), 44-56.
 

Manuel, J & Carter, D. (2015). Current and historical perspectives on Australian teenagers' reading practices and preferences. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 38(2), 115-128.

​

Merga, M. K. (2019). Reading Engagement for Tweens and Teens: What Would Make Them Read More? Libraries Unlimited.

​

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Australia - Country Note - PISA 2018 Results, Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/ PISA2018_CN_AUS.pdf 

​

Rodrigo, V., Greenberg, D., & Segal, D. (2014). Changes in reading habits by low literate adults through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(1), 73-91. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1031313.pdf 

​

Rutherford, L., Merga, M. K., & Singleton, A. (2018).  Influences on Australian adolescents’ recreational reading. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 41(1), 44-56.

​

Scholastic. (2019). Kids and Family Reading Report (7th Edition): Data Appendix. Retrieved from https://www.scholastic.com/content/dam/KFRR/Downloads/KFRR_Data %20Appendix_FindingTheirStory.pdf 

​

Sammons, P., Toth, K., & Sylva, K. (2018). The drivers of academic success for ‘bright’ but disadvantaged students: A longitudinal study of AS and A-level outcomes in England. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 57, 31-41. Retrieved from https://doi-org.simsrad.net.ocs.mq.edu.au/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.10.004 

​

Weeks, L. (2001, May 14). The No-Book Report: Skim It and Weep. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/2001/05/14/the-no-book-report-skim-it-and-weep/590f488d-c1fd-498d-81da-55269a967e94/ 

bottom of page